A633.5.3.RB- Reflections to Chaos
Observing the chaos game video
really opened my eyes to what chaos theory means. Throughout the week’s readings I learned what
chaos theory meant, but I never truly understood it until watching the
video. I knew that allowing some chaos
could actually become a more effective way of leading than trying to control
everything, but I could not think of an example. Then, watching the video made the light bulb
come on and I understood how simple chaos could make things. The people in the video would never have been
able to organize themselves so quickly had a leader attempted to do it.
This epiphany made me reflect on
some of our discussions this week about organizations and following the eight
principles. I have seen and discussed
the micro-managing that takes place in the Air Force, just as Meghan discussed
it in the Navy and other students mentioned it as well. After watching that video, it really became
clear to me how detrimental it can be.
For example, there are processes that are enforced that make no sense to
me. I was tasked with compiling a
spreadsheet that included all 150 members of my squadron’s remaining
semi-annual training. Think about that
task. Going through 150 people’s records to find out what training each person
still needed to do. I asked, “Wouldn’t
it be easier if I just emailed each person their record sheet and told them to
email me back with what they still needed?” I was told that I had to stick to
the rules and the way the process is done, and therefore had to waste hours and
hours completing a task that could have taken just minutes if I utilized the
chaos of the whole organization.
Chaos is the micro-manager’s worst
nightmare, but the efficient leader’s best friend. When leaders are controlling and have to do
everything or insist that they hold their employees’ hands through every single
process, they are extremely inefficient and a detriment to the
organization. When leaders allow chaos
to exist, they allow for a much more efficient organization. Yes, it is riskier to allow chaos as there
may be some mistakes made and minor set-backs, but the results attained from
the chaos will far outweigh the small consequences.
No comments:
Post a Comment